Dear listeners, let me welcome you to our live feature here at Harlequin Radio on “Conspiracy Theories and Fake News”. Of course we have again invited guests, whom I will introduce to you in a moment, but please participate directly. Our lines have already been open for an hour and we look forward to your contributions. My name is the Harlequin von Zurich and today I am pleased to welcome as guests: Mark Twain, Frank Zappa and Oscar Wilde.
I often get the urge to write in reaction to things that have a negative impact on me. Not necessarily just aggravations. Often it is people making things too easy for themselves. I notice time and again, for example, that there are spelling mistakes on many signs, or that journalists, who ought to be trained in this area, cannot get their grammar right. I’m neither a language specialist nor a purity fetishist, but I do believe that it doesn’t hurt to at least make an effort when you do something. It makes your own statements and actions a lot more credible.
…that’s what we thought until now. Far from it! As this sign from Switzerland proves, whatever is allowed must first be permitted. Or are we Swiss so meek that we have to be explicitly persuaded to do something legitimate?
Probably precaution rather than experience. Neither in 2018 nor in 2019 were there any reports of death from haute couture. But there were a number of base jumper fatalities – but you can’t really say they look that well-dressed.
Editor’s note: We have already introduced this friendly animal to you in 2019 with the article “Blame Management.” For the following text we thought it would be appropriate to get our “scapegoat” out of the archive once again!
After part 1 of this work finally exposed the perfidious and anti-democratic machinations of the big brewery mafia without mercy, now the announced continuation.
What has Sars-Cov2 to do with guilt? The answer is short and to the point: I have an suspicion.
Did you read it too? In Greenland and Hong Kong the consumption of alcohol has been banned or severely restricted. And in Mexico the Corona brewery was closed down. While in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, no more alcohol can be purchased, in Hong Kong no drinks with more than 2.25 percent alcohol content were allowed to be served and sales were completely prohibited.
Can the Cynefin model help in matters of the heart?
Quite a while
ago, the so-called Cynefin model (from the Welsh word meaning “habitat”)
achieved quite a bit of notoriety. It is a typology of a system or project that
provides a clue as to what kind of explanations and/or solutions apply or might
be helpful in uncertain contexts.
The model is
divided into four categories or contexts: simple, chaotic, complex and
Now from time
to time I too use one of those platforms where you can tell other people
something (about yourself). On this particular platform I was told someone I
knew had updated his or her relationship status to “complicated”.
Are the common approaches to risk management in projects still up to date?
I think not.
In a world
in which more change takes place every day than in the whole of 1880, the
almost exclusive focus on what is known and experienced is de facto pure
arrogance paired with ignorance (and this also applies to Central Switzerland).
iterative approaches such as Scrum, which are rightly said to be better suited
to rapid change and high complexity, provide only partial concrete answers.
Shorter sprints and transparency about the state of the delivery outcomes are
very helpful, but do not turn a turkey into a visionary yet.
But how can
we position ourselves in projects in such a way that we are better prepared for
unknown unknowns, or perhaps even draw something positive from them?
Now, for a
change, a topic in which satirical exaggeration is not so easy for me.
be the reason? Maybe the topic is simply too close to my heart, too important
to me. Also, I have not yet completely penetrated it myself, thought it through
to the end, internalized it. At least that’s what my gut tells me.
question the title again. Shouldn’t it actually be “I” instead of
“you” (or at least “we”)? But it’s OK. After all, I already
have a certain advantage, because I have already dealt with it. That’s enough of
doubt. What is it about? It’s about risk management.
This contribution is a joint production by the harlequins RGE and BCO.
RGE: We enjoyed celebrating at our office. Good deals, for example, or new customers. With bubbly.
business even went much better than expected. From the management’s point of
view, this was not very fortunate because our units were organised as profit
centres. The general demand for business growth was about 5% per year. If it
was actually higher, it automatically increased expectations the following